Oreste
Signore, <oreste@w3.org>
Responsabile Ufficio Italiano W3C
Area della Ricerca CNR - via Moruzzi, 1 - 56124 Pisa
La strutturazione delle informazioni nella
documentazione tecnica
organizzato da COM&TEC
- Associazione Italiana per la Comunicazione Tecnica
Udine, 23 maggio 2008
Presentazione: http://www.w3c.it/talks/2008/comTec2008/slides.html
Documento: http://www.w3c.it/papers/comTec2008.pdf
Jim Hendler
A set of knowledge terms, including the vocabulary, the semantic interconnections and some simple rules of inference and logic for some particular topic
Studer et al. (1998)
An ontology is a formal, explicit specification of a shared conceptualisation.
A 'conceptualisation' refers to an abstract model of some phenomenon in the world by having identified the relevant concepts of that phenomenon.
'Explicit' means that the type of concepts used, and the constraints on their use are explicitly defined. For example, in medical domains, the concepts are diseases and symptoms, the relations between them are causal and a constraint is that a disease cannot cause itself.
'Formal' refers to the fact that the ontology should be machine readable, which excludes natural language.
'Shared' reflects the notion that an ontology captures consensual knowledge, that is, it is not private to some individual, but accepted by a group.
Le previsioni Gartner nel 2007
By 2017, we expect the vision of the Semantic Web […] to coalesce […] and the majority of Web pages are decorated with some form of semantic hypertext.
By 2012, 80% of public Web sites will use some level of semantic hypertext to create SW documents […] 15% of public Web sites will use more extensive Semantic Web-based ontologies to create semantic databases
(nota: “semantic hypertext” si riferisce a strumenti e tecnologie come RDFa, microformat eventualmente con GRDDL, etc.)
Source: “Finding and Exploiting Value in Semantic Web Technologies on the Web”, Gartner Research Report, May 2007
RDF è per il Semantic Web ciò che HTML è stato per il web
(s,p,o)
è definita
in modo che:
s
", "p
" sono URI,
cioè risorse sul Web; "o
"
è un URI o un "literal"
p
"
collega, o mette in relazione
"s
" e "o
"
http://www.example.org/original
(<http://…isbn 6682>, <http://…/original>, <http://…isbn 409X>)
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://…/isbn/2020386682"> <f:titre xml:lang="fr">Le palais des mirroirs</f:titre> <f:original rdf:resource="http://…/isbn/000651409X"/> </rdf:Description>
(Nota: per semplificare gli URI sono stati usati i namespace)
eXtensible
Metadata
Platform
Domande?
Se non è sul Web non esiste ...
... troverete sul sito dell' Ufficio (http://www.w3c.it/)
le slide (http://www.w3c.it/talks/2008/comTec2008/)
e il documento (http://www.w3c.it/papers/comTec2008.pdf)