<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-7"?>
<rdf:RDF xml:lang="en"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:crm="cd://#" xml:base="//">
<crm:E84.Information_Carrier rdf:about="Epitaphios GE34604">
<crm:P2F.has_type>
<crm:E55.Type rdf:about="ecclesiastical embroidery">
</crm:E55.Type>
</crm:P2F.has_type>
<crm:P2F.has_type>
<crm:E55.Type rdf:about="liturgical cloth">
</crm:E55.Type>
</crm:P2F.has_type>
<crm:P52F.has_current_owner>
<crm:E40.Legal_Body rdf:about="Museum Benaki">
</crm:E40.Legal_Body>
</crm:P52F.has_current_owner>
<crm:P55F.has_current_location>
<crm:E53.Place rdf:about="drawer 8 / case 27 / room 6 / floor sub 1 / new wing">
<crm:P2F.has_type>
<crm:E55.Type rdf:about="drawer">
</crm:E55.Type>
...
- just a serialization format for metadata: ensures interoperability across SW tools
- OWL meets and exceeds current CRM needs: a number of reasoners available